Efforts To Disrupt Railway Ticketing System Ought To Be Stopped: Supreme Court

Indian Railways is a keystone of our nation’s infrastructure and any effort to disrupt the integrity and stability of the ticketing system should be stopped on its tracks, the Supreme Courtroom stated on Thursday.

A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Prashant Kumar Mishra was listening to two separate appeals of two males accused of fraud in railway ticketing.

“The Indian Railways is a keystone of our nation’s infrastructure. It carries round 673 crore passengers yearly and has an incredible impression on the financial system of this nation. Any effort to disrupt the integrity and stability of the ticketing system needs to be stopped on its tracks,” the bench stated.

The appeals have been over the interpretation of Part 143 of the Railways Act, 1989, which offers for imposing of penalty for unauthorised companies of procuring and provide of railway tickets.

The primary enchantment challenged a Kerala Excessive Courtroom order quashing the legal proceedings below Part 143 of the Act launched in opposition to one Mathew Okay Cheriian.

Cheriian was accused of making fraudulent person IDs with the IRCTC portal to acquire and peddle railway tickets for revenue, with out being an authorised agent.

Within the different enchantment, one J Ramesh challenged a Madras Excessive Courtroom judgment refusing to quash the legal proceedings in opposition to him below Part 143 of the Act.

Ramesh, an authorised agent, was accused of supplying e-tickets, booked by way of a number of person IDs, to numerous clients.

The highest courtroom stated Mathew, not being an authorised agent of the railways ought to face the proceedings below Part 143 of the Railways Act, 1989.

“Any breach needs to be remedied by civil motion and never legal motion. To sum up, Mathew not being an authorised agent has to face the proceedings in opposition to him whereas Ramesh, being an authorised agent, can’t be proceeded in opposition to below Part 143 of the Act for alleged breach of any of the phrases and circumstances of the contract. If, in any respect, he could be liable to face civil motion,” the bench held.

The highest courtroom, nevertheless, quashed the legal proceedings in opposition to Ramesh, and stated, “Part 143, by being utterly silent on creation of a number of person IDs, penalises the actions of solely the unauthorised brokers and never unauthorised actions of the authorised brokers. Thus, even when the details disclosed within the first info report are taken at face worth, fee of an offence can’t be attributed to Ramesh.” The bench agreed with the prosecution on Part 143, a penal provision, being enacted to sort out a social crime.

(Aside from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)