27 C
Sunday, January 17, 2021
Home India News MJ Akbar, Journalist Priya Ramani Refuse Settlement In Defamation Case

MJ Akbar, Journalist Priya Ramani Refuse Settlement In Defamation Case

Former minister MJ Akbar had filed a defamation criticism towards journalist Priya Ramani

New Delhi:

Former minister MJ Akbar and journalist Priya Ramani on Tuesday refused any settlement between them in a legal defamation criticism filed by him towards her.

Senior advocate Geeta Luthra, showing for MJ Akbar, stated that if Ms Ramani was apologetic for her allegations, she would ask him to contemplate closing the criticism.

Ms Ramani’s counsel, Bhavook Chauhan, stated nonetheless that she stood by her assertion and if MJ Akbar needed to withdraw the criticism, he could accomplish that.

Did the counsel (for each the events) have an opportunity to speak or are the doorways shut, the courtroom sought to know on Tuesday.

Ms Ramani’s advocate replied in destructive. No, our stand is evident. Ms Ramani stands by her assertion. If the complainant desires to withdraw, then he could carry it on document.

Ms Luthra, then again stated, I’ve gone on with my matter. If the accused was apologetic… If there may be any indication from them (accused and her counsel) I’ll ask my briefing counsel.

Briefing counsels are hyperlink between the consumer and a ‘senior advocate’.

After the submission on behalf of Ms Ramani, Akbar’s counsel stated, Let’s proceed on deserves.

Akbar had filed the criticism towards Ms Ramani for allegedly defaming him by accusing him of sexual misconduct round 20 years in the past when he was a journalist.

Ms Ramani had stated the allegations towards MJ Akbar, made within the wake of #MeToo motion in 2018, had been her fact and had been made in public good.

Further Chief Metropolitan Justice of the Peace (ACMM) Ravindra Kumar Pandey, who began listening to afresh the ultimate arguments within the case, had on Saturday requested each the events whether or not there was an opportunity of settlement between them within the matter.


ACMM Pandey began listening to afresh the ultimate arguments within the case because the earlier choose listening to the matter was transferred to a different courtroom final week.

In the course of the listening to, Ms Luthra knowledgeable the courtroom in regards to the case and MJ Akbar’s assertion recorded earlier.

She additionally knowledgeable the courtroom in regards to the statements recorded by the witnesses showing for MJ Akbar earlier.

The courtroom will take up the matter on December 2.

Akbar had filed the legal defamation criticism towards Ms Ramani in October 15, 2018. He had resigned as Union minister on October 17, 2018.

Akbar had earlier informed the courtroom that Ms Ramani had defamed him through the use of adjectives corresponding to ‘media’s greatest predator’ that harmed his fame.

Akbar has denied all of the allegations of sexual harassment towards the ladies who got here ahead throughout #MeToo marketing campaign towards him.

Over 20 ladies got here up with accounts of the alleged sexual harassment by Akbar him whereas they had been working as journalists underneath him.

He termed the allegations false, fabricated and deeply distressing and stated he was taking acceptable authorized motion towards them.

(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is printed from a syndicated feed.)

Most Popular

Budget 2021: Rationalise GST On Food Delivery To 5%, Says Industry Body

<!-- -->A excessive fee of 23-24 per cent by meals supply platforms have turned out to be a ache levelThe eating places and...

NRF: Holiday 2020 sales better than expected | Home Accents Today

WASHINGTON—Vacation gross sales at furnishings and residential furnishings shops had been up 2.2%, a part of an unexpectedly strong November-December vacation promoting interval,...

What Are Voice Rate Cutter Recharge Plans

Voice fee cutter plans are recharge plans that concentrate on, because the title suggests, cheaper name charges. The USP for these plans just...

799 cases pending under scrapped IT Act section

(This story initially appeared in on Jan 17, 2021)At the very least 799 instances are nonetheless pending in opposition to folks underneath...

Recent Comments