NCLAT stays insolvency proceedings against HCL Technologies

In a serious reduction to , the Nationwide Firm Regulation Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has stayed the insolvency proceedings initiated in opposition to it on a plea filed by a creditor. A two-member NCLAT bench, whereas admitting the petition filed by HCL Tech MD and CEO C Vijayakumar stayed the Nationwide Firm Regulation Tribunal (NCLT) order of January 17, 2022, to provoke insolvency in opposition to the IT main.

The appellate tribunal additionally issued discover to Sahaj Bharti Travels, which had claimed a default of Rs 3.54 crore by HCL Tech, to file its reply inside two weeks and in addition granted one week to the IT agency to file a rejoinder to it.

The NCLAT has directed to listing the matter on February 16 for the following listening to.

“Within the meantime, the order dated January 17, 2022, handed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) shall stay stayed,” mentioned the NCLAT bench headed by Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan.

An HCL spokesperson mentioned: “The corporate has appealed to the NCLAT, who’ve stayed the mentioned NCLT order”.

On January 17, 2022, the NCLT had directed the initiation of insolvency proceedings in opposition to HCL Tech, admitting default over claims of Rs 3.54 crore by Sahaj Bharti Travels.

The NCLT order was challenged by the HCL Tech MD earlier than the appellate tribunal NCLAT.

HCL Tech had submitted that it was not a case the place the decision proceedings should have been initiated.

Sahaj Bharti Travels had demanded an quantity of Rs 3.54 crore on the declare of a minimal assure of transport expenses from April 30, 2015, to December 31, 2018.

Nonetheless – HCL Tech whereas submitting a reply on June 25, 2019 – had denied the declare and indicated that the minimal assure declare was not payable as a result of there was a breach of circumstances and a penalty was additionally imposed on the cab operator.

HCL Tech additionally mentioned all the cost about invoices issued by the operational creditor has been made.

Agreeing to it, the NCLAT mentioned: “We now have seemed into the reply by which discover of dispute was given, which point out {that a} real dispute was raised by the Company Debtor (HCL)”.

It additional noticed that the NCLT proceeded to resolve the dispute between the events like a civil courtroom, which ought to not have been finished. “We’re happy that the case has been made out to grant an interim reduction,” mentioned the NCLAT whereas staying the order.

Keep on high of technology and startup news that issues. Subscribe to our day by day e-newsletter for the most recent and must-read tech information, delivered straight to your inbox.