US District Decide Lewis A. Kaplan wrote in an opinion that Andrew’s attorneys didn’t efficiently problem the constitutionality of Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit.
Giuffre sued the prince in August, saying she was coerced into sexual encounters with Andrew in 2001 by Epstein and his longtime companion, Ghislaine Maxwell.
His attorneys had mentioned that the lawsuit lacked specificity and was disqualified by a deal she reached in 2009 with attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. In addition they attacked the credibility and motives of Giuffre, saying in October that the lawsuit was geared toward reaching “one other payday at his expense and on the expense of these closest to him.” The prince’s attorneys have mentioned that Andrew by no means sexually abused or assaulted Giuffre and that he “unequivocally denies Giuffre’s false allegations towards him.”
The prince himself has strenuously denied Giuffre’s allegations. In late 2019, Prince Andrew informed BBC Newsnight that intercourse with Giuffre “did not occur” and he has “no recollection” of ever assembly her.
The interview was broadly panned by critics who mentioned Andrew appeared insensitive to Epstein’s victims. Afterward, the prince stepped again from royal duties.
On Wednesday, his attorneys didn’t instantly reply to messages searching for remark. Buckingham Palace informed The Related Press that it will not touch upon the “ongoing authorized matter.”
Kaplan famous that he was required by legislation, at this stage of the litigation, to proceed as if the allegations made by Giuffre are true.
“The legislation prohibits the Courtroom from contemplating at this stage of the proceedings defendant’s efforts to solid doubt on the reality of Ms Giuffre’s allegations, despite the fact that his efforts could be permissible at trial,” Kaplan mentioned.
Giuffre’s settlement with Epstein was reached a decade earlier than the financier killed himself at a Manhattan lockup as he awaited a intercourse trafficking trial in 2019.
However Kaplan wrote that there have been substantial indications within the USD 500,000 settlement that Epstein and Giuffre didn’t clearly intend for language to “immediately,” “primarily,” or “considerably” profit somebody such because the prince. He famous that the prince was not a celebration to the settlement.
He additionally mentioned the settlement was “removed from a mannequin of clear and exact drafting.” The choose’s findings mirrored feedback he made throughout oral arguments by each side when he was significantly dismissive of the arguments made on the prince’s behalf.
Epstein, 66, killed himself in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 whereas awaiting a intercourse trafficking trial, whereas Maxwell, 60, was lately convicted of intercourse trafficking and conspiracy fees in federal court docket in New York. Giuffre’s allegations towards Andrew weren’t part of both felony case.
The Related Press doesn’t sometimes establish individuals who say they’re victims of sexual assault except they select to come back ahead publicly, as Giuffre has.