“That’s probably the most outrageous lie I’ve ever heard,” Amodei mentioned, visibly pissed off. “I’ve mentioned nothing that anyplace close to resembles the concept that this firm must be the one one to construct the know-how.”
The feedback come amid a widening philosophical divide within the tech world—between these calling for managed, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full throttle.
A Battle of Beliefs
The feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, “He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,” referring to Amodei’s lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI’s disruptive potential.
Amodei has indeed sounded the alarm on AI’s capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs.
“I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,” Huang said at the summit.
Race to the Top vs. Race to the Bottom
On the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a “race to the top”—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. “When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn’t matter who wins—everyone loses,” he said. “With a race to the top, it doesn’t matter who wins because everyone wins.” He pointed to Anthropic’s transparent policies, such as their “Responsible Scaling Policy” and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry.
“We’ve released our work so others can build on it,” Amodei said. “Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it’s worth it for the field to grow responsibly.”
A Clash Rooted in Business and Belief
There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei’s support for semiconductor export controls to China may hinder NVIDIA’s huge chip gross sales, notably within the AI increase the place demand for highly effective GPUs is hovering. Huang, whose firm stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held again his criticism of Amodei.
Amodei, nonetheless, is adamant that the friction isn’t about limiting competitors however about fostering accountability in an trade the place errors can have international penalties.
“It’s simply an unbelievable and dangerous religion distortion,” he mentioned of Huang’s allegation.
Because the race towards superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights a necessary query: who will get to outline “secure” within the age of AI?
Whereas Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic proceed pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence, the actual divide might not lie in mannequin sizes or compute energy—however in values. Ought to AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it want extra management and warning, as Amodei argues?
Discover more from News Journals
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
