Constitution Doesn’t Support Forced Or Fraudulent Conversion: Allahabad High Court

Prayagraj:

Allahabad Excessive Courtroom has noticed that although the Indian Structure offers each citizen the suitable to freely observe and unfold their faith, it doesn’t help compelled or fraudulent conversions.

Justice Vinod Diwaker made the commentary whereas rejecting a plea to cancel an FIR in opposition to 4 individuals accused underneath the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Illegal Non secular Conversion Act, 2021.

In accordance with the criticism, the accused tried to transform individuals to Christianity by providing cash and free medical care.

The courtroom refused to cancel the case, stating that the fees have been severe and legitimate sufficient for police investigation.

In its judgment, the courtroom noticed, “India’s constitutional framework ensures the suitable to spiritual freedom underneath Article 25. This Article confers upon each individual the basic proper to freely profess, practise and propagate faith, topic to public order, morality and well being. The usage of the phrase ‘freely’ in Article 25 underscores the voluntary nature of non secular perception and expression.” “Nevertheless, the Structure doesn’t endorse compelled or fraudulent conversions, nor does it defend coercive or misleading practices underneath the guise of non secular propagation,” it added.

The courtroom maintained that these limitations are important to make sure that the train of non secular freedom doesn’t disrupt the societal cloth or endanger particular person and communal well-being.

“The presumption that one faith is inherently superior to different clearly presupposes the ethical and non secular superiority of 1 faith over one other. Such notion is essentially antithetical to the concept of secularism. Indian secularism is rooted within the precept of equal respect for all religions. The state should neither determine with nor favour any faith, however as an alternative preserve a principled equidistance from all religions and religion,” the ruling mentioned.

Commenting on the 2021 Act prohibiting illegal spiritual conversion introduced in by the Uttar Pradesh authorities, the courtroom said that it was enacted to keep up public order, ethical integrity and well being in alignment with Article 25 of the Structure.

“The first object of the Act is to ban conversions from one faith to a different which can be carried out by way of misrepresentation, drive, undue affect, coercion, allurement, fraudulent means or marriage for the only goal of illegal conversion. By concentrating on such strategies, the regulation seeks to stop exploitation and manipulation that would have broader destabilising results on social concord, apart from disruption of regulation and order,” the ruling mentioned.

The Might 7 judgment additionally seemed right into a authorized difficulty as as to if a police officer could be thought-about an “aggrieved individual” underneath Part 4 of the 2021 Act. This part usually permits solely the sufferer or shut family members to file a criticism. The bench clarified that the station home officer can file such FIRs as a result of the regulation should be learn with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita provisions that permit the police to behave in cognizable offences. 

(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is printed from a syndicated feed.)