The courtroom official stated the convicts uploaded blasphemous content material on Fb from 4 completely different IDs.
“The decide after listening to arguments of each prosecution and defence and witnesses accounts awarded the dying penalty and 80 years imprisonment to every of them on completely different counts,” the official stated.
They have been additionally slapped with a positive of PKR 5.2 million.
Pakistan’s Federal Investigation (FIA) Cybercrime registered a case beneath the PECA (Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act) and Pakistan Penal Code on the grievance of Shiraz Farooqi, a citizen.
In accordance with Amnesty International, Pakistan’s blasphemy legal guidelines are sometimes used towards spiritual minorities and others who’re the goal of false accusations, whereas emboldening vigilantes ready to threaten or kill the accused.
Uncover the tales of your curiosity
“There may be overwhelming proof that Pakistan’s blasphemy legal guidelines violate human rights and encourage folks to take the regulation into their very own palms. As soon as an individual is accused, they turn out to be ensnared in a system that gives them few protections, presumes them responsible, and fails to safeguard them towards folks keen to make use of violence,” it stated. Amnesty Worldwide added that in perversion of the justice system, the accused are sometimes presumed to be responsible based mostly on little or no proof.
“As soon as an accusation of blasphemy is made, the police can arrest the accused, with out even checking to see if the costs make sense. Bowing to public strain from offended crowds, together with spiritual clerics and their supporters, they ceaselessly go instances on to prosecutors with out scrutinising the proof. And as soon as somebody is charged, they are often denied bail and face prolonged and unfair trials,” it stated.
Discover more from News Journals
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
