‘Vala : The Story of a Bangle’ review: An interesting premise let down by poor execution

On the centre of Vala: The Story of a Bangle is, properly, a bangle, which all people appears to need. There’s a legend hooked up to this valuable stones-encrusted bangle of Arabian origins, which may lead the viewers to assume that possibly the movie is alongside the traces of Padakkalam – an vintage object with supernatural powers. No, the bangle doesn’t possess such powers. Vala is nearly about greed, hubris, and redemption, amongst different issues, however falls brief regardless of the offbeat premise.

Written by Harshad, who scripted Unda, Dayom Panthrandum (which he additionally directed), Puzhu, and Kadina Kadhoramee Andakadaham, Vala has been directed by Muhashin. His final movie was Kadina Kadhoramee Andakadaham.

That is the story of two {couples} — Banu Prakash and Vishalakshi, and Purushothaman and Sarala — and their pre-occupation with the bangle. Purushothaman Nair (Purushu), essayed by an impish Dhyan Sreenivasan, is a rich, small-time politician married to Sarala (Raveena Ravi), an worker at Akshaya Centre. The bangle belongs to Sarala, which, curiously, she can not take off her wrist. The twist within the story comes when Vishalakshi (Sheethal Joseph) sees it on a go to to the Akshaya Centre; by the way, on the finish of an argument between the 2, Vishalakshi decides she needs a bangle that’s related. 

The provocation is that she has eloped with Banu (Lukman Avaran), a policeman, taking alongside together with her what she thought was gold jewelry from dwelling. It occurs to be her grandmother’s previous field of trinkets. That realisation leaves her feeling insufficient regardless of Banu’s fixed reassurance. She, nevertheless, fixates on getting the same bangle, and that’s the motion of Vala.

It could be simple guilty Vishalakshi for being infantile in her demand, however the viewers understands why she behaves that method — she has left dwelling, been disowned by her dad and mom, and resides in a home with strangers. Once we meet Purushu, we get a sense that he’s not as smiley as he seems; he has a grasping aspect to him. Harshad’s writing captures the internal ideas of the characters, however one needs for extra depth to them. Particularly the animosity between Banu and Purushu.  

The narration follows the principle levels of storytelling; nevertheless, the primary half takes up time to put the muse, introduce the characters and their motives, and set the motion in movement. A big a part of the primary half makes one marvel about what course, if in any respect, the film would take. Fortuitously, the motion picks up simply earlier than the interval.  

The second half makes you sit up, as a result of up till then, it seems like we’re additionally aimlessly going about in circles. The second half lays naked the motion, and a lot of the whys and hows are answered. The bangle might be taken off, we be taught. We additionally be taught who it belongs to, as a result of within the first half, we discover out that it isn’t a household heirloom as Sarala claims. The bangle belongs to Fatima (Santhi Krishna). It’s gifted to her by her husband Soopikka (Vijayaraghavan).

Soopikka and Banu have a historical past, albeit an disagreeable one, which is particularly unflattering to Banu. Retrieving the bangle to return it to Soopikka and Fatima turns into a mission to redeem himself. Purushu, in the meantime, is determined to get the bangle off his spouse’s hand as a result of he has taken cash from a gangster for it. After some anticipated and a few surprising twists, the bangle reaches the arms of the Superintendent of Police.

ALSO READ: Jeethu Joseph interview | I want to tell as many different kinds of stories as possible

That is the place the movie challenges one’s widespread sense. All people related with the bangle gathers on the SP’s home (why?), the place the stolen property is handed over to him (once more, why?). Soopikka is suspicious concerning the cop’s intentions (that he would pocket it), which we additionally perceive.  

That is problematic on many ranges. Essentially the most primary query is “Can we belief our cops?” One sincerely hopes this doesn’t occur prefer it does within the movie. It’s a terrifying thought. 

Muhashin has extracted the perfect from his actors, they usually have delivered, particularly Lukman, whose efficiency has matured over time. Because the hassled, henpecked, and in love Banu, he tugs our heartstrings. Dhyan, as Purushu, with shades of gray, is in his aspect, very completely different from his goofy, clickbait-y on-line persona. Vijayaraghavan and Santhi Krishna make a candy couple. Raveena, Sheethal, and others additionally impress. Music composer Govind Vasantha seems in a cameo.

Vala, regardless of its redeeming elements, fails to capitalise on a promising thought. Simply after we assume it can come collectively, it doesn’t. There are some flashes of humour, which once more aren’t sufficient to save lots of the film.

Vala is at present working in theatres

Revealed – September 19, 2025 07:23 pm IST